I tried to put everything in and therefore failed
Partially to justify my teaching adults to paint watercolour, yet feeling like the emperor, I paint watercolours in South Bohemia, liking what I did and realise there were too many holes in my technique I return, we buy a small flat and can continue to paint from the same landscape each summer, Watercolour is then followed by ink, followed by acrylic, followed by oil. The subject matter varies from fields to farms to villages to trees, that being the last topic I attempted.
Put people in my paintings? Technically I am scared of painting people because of a lack of technique, whilst I know if I were to put aside another summer I could get that ability back, I would still be confronted by the context The only figures that have been in my paintings successfully have been nude and never in a stylised form. Nude but not naked; akin to the conception of a classical landscape out of time, clothes lock it to the now or are dressing up. Or they are icons without a justifiable stylisation, this is disconcerting as I can only make them fit in as a quotation,.
For the most part I attended to some notion of truth in respect of colour, that is to say I suppressed aesthetic ideas of colour harmony and balance and tried to find a truthful understanding (in itself a subjective concept) of the nature of the colour in front of me. During the course of a painting day, colour is subject to change, yet I attempt to extract a truth about its nature, an enterprise that is bound to fail. (How cultural and aesthetic are the ostensibly objective explorations of colour in the impressionist painters.) Maybe the most successful as paintings are those where I lacked stamina and chickened out to culturally bound gestures that make a good painting.
Product or process? I had inherited a concept as painting as process, partially from the modernist tradition that I tagged onto, but primarily from the composers who interested me. From 1975 to 1979 I took this to the extreme of rarely making a finished product. Without exiting process, gradually I learnt to consider my work as products, but products without much in the way of showroom appeal, for those who can still read a painting and unravel the route and intentions, but why should I make such an effort not to please people?
New sequences of paintings often arise at the point when I feel I will never paint again, they then slink into my life through a crack in the armour, often a trivial crack at that.
The Vodnaňy paintings were a response to one of these cracks, not having paintings in me I started from the given of an existing landscape, Enlarged a detail, overlaid it with supposition, luckily it was not long before the exploration of the material took on its own life. Many years ago my paintings were described as palimpsests, this referred to the constant erasure of layers of painting leaving its traces, now it could refer to the layers of meaning I attempt to abstract from the given material (then as paintings now as description.) Was it inherent in what I had always made? I think in clauses embedded in clauses, looking has become the dissecting of real or imaginary multiple meanings behind the immediate impression. The peeling stucco reveals the once present door that collectivisation blocked when the grand building was subdivided for the workers, then restituted to be further subdivided but now as a commercial commodity. The blandly perfect stucco covers its history whilst still revealing the changing value of energy, its inability to interact with light the presence of insulating foam board just beneath its surface.
Maybe I could find more paintings within this material, I don’t know.
I wanted a painting for a friends wedding, because of the multiple levels of their involvement with the Czech lands it seemed the most obvious step of taking a detail from one of these Vodnaňy paintings and exploring that. The second attempt was successful.
However after coming to a halt with further ideas I took the first of these paintings as the starting point for a new sequence. This time the connections with reality and history where long erased and it would become an exercise in aesthetic judgement. Soon I understood it was something akin to a set of Etudes in the Debussy tradition; exploring techniques in the context of polished self contained art pieces. To help me along and as the first painting had a lively rhythm I loosely related each painting to a dance form, an idea that was forgotten by the fifth painting.
I was doing an exploration of oil painting with my adult students, myself not having used oil paint for over 25 years and then only superficially, a moment similar to the taking up of landscape painting; I needed to get my hand in! It was the inability of getting a blue that I knew must exist and the realisation that only with oil could I find it that this sequence became my reintroduction to oil paint








